CQQQ vs. ECNS
CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) and ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds - CQQQ tracks the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index while ECNS tracks the MSCI China Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ returned 5.33%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for ECNS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CQQQ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ECNS.
Performance
CQQQ vs. ECNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than ECNS's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ has outperformed ECNS with an annualized return of 5.33%, while ECNS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.
CQQQ
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 20.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- -6.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
ECNS
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- 6M
- -16.21%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 1Y
- -9.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- -7.96%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
CQQQ vs. ECNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 3.44% | 34.96% | 9.84% | -16.71% | -30.09% | -24.54% | 57.33% | 33.57% | -34.77% | 74.31% |
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | -10.59% | 36.49% | 5.64% | -23.05% | -24.58% | 2.11% | 25.42% | 7.84% | -18.27% | 27.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQQQ and ECNS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2010 | 0.74 |
The correlation between CQQQ and ECNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CQQQ vs. ECNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CQQQ
ECNS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CQQQ
ECNS
Communication Services
CQQQ
ECNS
Consumer Cyclical
CQQQ
ECNS
Industrials
CQQQ
ECNS
Financial Services
CQQQ
ECNS
Basic Materials
CQQQ
ECNS
Consumer Defensive
CQQQ
-
ECNS
Energy
CQQQ
-
ECNS
Healthcare
CQQQ
-
ECNS
Real Estate
CQQQ
-
ECNS
Utilities
CQQQ
-
ECNS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQQQ vs. ECNS — Risk / Return Rank
CQQQ
ECNS
CQQQ vs. ECNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CQQQ | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.94 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | -0.36 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | -0.78 | +2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CQQQ vs. ECNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than ECNS's maximum drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and ECNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQQQ | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.99% | -63.43% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.41% | -25.73% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.93% | -31.72% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.11% | -58.03% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.99% | -63.43% | -10.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.69% | -42.44% | -6.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.42% | -29.47% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.84% | 11.83% | -0.99% |
Volatility
CQQQ vs. ECNS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) at 6.60%. This indicates that CQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQQQ | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.00% | 6.60% | +5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.26% | 14.00% | +10.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.85% | 20.94% | +10.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.31% | 29.48% | +8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.48% | 25.80% | +7.68% |
CQQQ vs. ECNS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ECNS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CQQQ vs. ECNS - Dividend Comparison
CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than ECNS's 6.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.09% | 2.17% | 0.28% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 1.69% | 1.77% |
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.58% | 6.20% | 5.98% | 4.89% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CQQQ and ECNS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CQQQ has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to ECNS (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQQQ dropped -73.99% vs ECNS's -63.43%.
On 10-year performance, CQQQ leads with 5.33% vs 1.05% for ECNS. On fees, ECNS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ECNS has been the lower-risk option at 6.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CQQQ has performed better with a 5.33% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ECNS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.
ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 2.09% for CQQQ.
CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index, while ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 0.59% for ECNS.
CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CQQQ and ECNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer