PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPST vs. CANQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPST vs. CANQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPST) and Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPST achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly higher than CANQ's -1.36% return.


CPST

1D
0.13%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.02%
6M
2.02%
1Y
9.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CANQ

1D
0.90%
1M
2.83%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
17.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPST vs. CANQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPST and CANQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.71

The correlation between CPST and CANQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPST vs. CANQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPST
CPST Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CANQ
CANQ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CANQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CANQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPST vs. CANQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPST) and Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSTCANQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.40

1.65

+1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.87

2.33

+3.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.30

+0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.25

1.65

+4.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.44

5.24

+25.20

CPST vs. CANQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPST Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is higher than the CANQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPST and CANQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPSTCANQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

1.65

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.82

1.07

+0.75

Drawdowns

CPST vs. CANQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPST drawdown since its inception was -3.79%, smaller than the maximum CANQ drawdown of -12.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPST and CANQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSTCANQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-12.79%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.42%

-10.77%

+9.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.08%

+5.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-3.05%

+2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

3.39%

-3.10%

Volatility

CPST vs. CANQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPST) is 1.15%, while Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that CPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CPSTCANQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

3.85%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.73%

7.75%

-6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73%

10.41%

-7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.49%

12.70%

-9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.49%

12.70%

-9.21%

CPST vs. CANQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPST has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CANQ's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPST vs. CANQ - Dividend Comparison

CPST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CANQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%.