PortfoliosLab logo
CANQ vs. GPIQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CANQ and GPIQ is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CANQ vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CANQ:

1.11

GPIQ:

0.63

Sortino Ratio

CANQ:

1.53

GPIQ:

0.96

Omega Ratio

CANQ:

1.20

GPIQ:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

CANQ:

1.21

GPIQ:

0.61

Martin Ratio

CANQ:

3.27

GPIQ:

2.15

Ulcer Index

CANQ:

4.72%

GPIQ:

6.02%

Daily Std Dev

CANQ:

14.83%

GPIQ:

22.83%

Max Drawdown

CANQ:

-12.79%

GPIQ:

-21.06%

Current Drawdown

CANQ:

-4.00%

GPIQ:

-3.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANQ achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 1.76% return.


CANQ

YTD

0.77%

1M

3.87%

6M

3.50%

1Y

16.46%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GPIQ

YTD

1.76%

1M

6.58%

6M

2.15%

1Y

14.40%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CANQ vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANQ has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CANQ vs. GPIQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CANQ is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CANQ is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CANQ is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CANQ is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CANQ is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CANQ is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GPIQ is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CANQ vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CANQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANQ and GPIQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CANQ vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

CANQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, less than GPIQ's 10.39% yield.


Drawdowns

CANQ vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANQ drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANQ and GPIQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CANQ vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) is 2.75%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that CANQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...