CPST vs. CBOJ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CPST (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September) and CBOJ (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from Calamos - CPST tracks the MerQube Cap Protect US Lrg Cap PR Index - Sep while CBOJ tracks the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CPST returned 7.56% vs -4.01% for CBOJ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CPST vs. CBOJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPST) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPST achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than CBOJ's -1.64% return.

CPST

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 7.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBOJ

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: -1.64%
• 6M: -1.89%
• 1Y: -4.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPST vs. CBOJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPST Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September	2.83%	5.96%
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-1.64%	-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CPST and CBOJ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

CPST vs. CBOJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPST

CPST Risk / Return Rank: 95
CPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CPST Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CPST Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CBOJ

CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 4
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPST vs. CBOJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPST) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPST	CBOJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.63	-0.82	+4.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.02	-1.10	+7.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.83	0.87	+0.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.34	-0.50	+5.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.83	-0.75	+29.58

CPST vs. CBOJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPST Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is higher than the CBOJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPST and CBOJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPST vs. CBOJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPST drawdown since its inception was -3.79%, smaller than the maximum CBOJ drawdown of -8.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPST and CBOJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPST	CBOJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-8.13%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.42%	-8.13%	+6.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.96%	+7.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.34%	-3.28%	+2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	5.33%	-5.07%

Volatility

CPST vs. CBOJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPST) is 0.44%, while Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) has a volatility of 0.85%. This indicates that CPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBOJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPST	CBOJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	0.85%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.60%	2.34%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09%	4.90%	-2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.34%	4.53%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.34%	4.53%	-1.19%

CPST vs. CBOJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPST and CBOJ have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CPST vs. CBOJ - Dividend Comparison

CPST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	3.21%	3.16%
CPST Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPST and CBOJ in my portfolio?

CPST and CBOJ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPST or CBOJ?

CBOJ has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to CPST (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPST dropped -3.79% vs CBOJ's -8.13%.

Which ETF is better, CPST or CBOJ?

On 1-year performance, CPST leads with 7.56% vs -4.01% for CBOJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPST or CBOJ?

Over the 1-year period, CPST has performed better with a 7.56% return vs -4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPST or CBOJ?

CPST and CBOJ have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPST or CBOJ?

CBOJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 0.00% for CPST.

What is the main difference between CPST and CBOJ?

CPST tracks MerQube Cap Protect US Lrg Cap PR Index - Sep, while CBOJ tracks CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.