PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPS vs. CRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CPS vs. CRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS) and Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPS achieves a -10.23% return, which is significantly higher than CRK's -42.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CPS has underperformed CRK with an annualized return of -10.34%, while CRK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.96% annualized return.


CPS

1D
1.73%
1M
11.67%
6M
-6.06%
YTD
-10.23%
1Y
11.88%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
-10.34%
ALL TIME*
-0.83%

CRK

1D
4.41%
1M
-9.67%
6M
-45.54%
YTD
-42.80%
1Y
-19.20%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
18.13%
10Y*
16.96%
ALL TIME*
-1.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.57M$4.26M$4.67M
$34.07M$34.06M$38.78M

CPS vs. CRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPS
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc.
-10.23%142.11%-30.60%115.67%-59.57%-35.36%4.55%-46.62%-49.29%18.49%
CRK
Comstock Resources, Inc.
-42.80%27.22%105.88%-32.37%70.63%85.13%-46.90%81.68%-46.45%-14.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CPS and CRK is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.18

The correlation between CPS and CRK shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPS:

$523.25M

CRK:

$3.89B

EPS

CPS:

-$1.83K

CRK:

$1.84

PS Ratio

CPS:

0.00

CRK:

2.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPS:

$688.43B

CRK:

$1.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPS:

$82.66B

CRK:

$1.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPS:

$202.33M

CRK:

$1.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPS vs. CRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPS
CPS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CRK
CRK Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRK Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRK Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPS vs. CRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS) and Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPSCRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.96

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

-0.47

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

-0.87

+1.75

CPS vs. CRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the CRK Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPS and CRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPS vs. CRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPS drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, roughly equal to the maximum CRK drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPS and CRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSCRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.44%

-99.32%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.59%

-54.77%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.93%

-59.73%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.61%

-64.25%

-22.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.44%

-68.63%

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.65%

-96.59%

+16.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.11%

-62.75%

+16.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.25%

30.09%

-4.84%

Volatility

CPS vs. CRK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS) is 11.93%, while Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) has a volatility of 13.76%. This indicates that CPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPSCRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.93%

13.76%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.57%

39.19%

+8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.90%

56.79%

+8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.75%

58.21%

+28.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.91%

67.05%

+10.86%

Dividends

CPS vs. CRK - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPS nor CRK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CPS
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRK
Comstock Resources, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.65%0.91%

Financials

CPS vs. CRK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. and Comstock Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CPS vs. CRK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. and Comstock Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 82.42B and revenue of 686.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.0%.

CRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 317.94M and revenue of 353.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.0%.

CPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 28.69M and revenue of 686.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.58M and revenue of 353.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

CPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -33.30B and revenue of 686.36B, resulting in a net margin of -4.9%.

CRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 9.33M and revenue of 353.28M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPS and CRK have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRK has higher volatility (13.76%) compared to CPS (11.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPS dropped -97.44% vs CRK's -99.32%.

CPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPS and CRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer