CPS vs. QXO
CPS (Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc.) and QXO (QXO, Inc) are both stocks. CPS operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while QXO operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CPS returned -9.80%/yr vs 7.71%/yr for QXO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPS vs. QXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPS achieves a -8.38% return, which is significantly higher than QXO's -14.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CPS has underperformed QXO with an annualized return of -9.80%, while QXO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return.
CPS
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- -8.38%
- 6M
- -0.95%
- 1Y
- 43.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.56%
- 10Y*
- -9.80%
QXO
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -14.02%
- YTD
- -14.77%
- 6M
- -17.80%
- 1Y
- -1.20%
- 3Y*
- -6.04%
- 5Y*
- -18.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
CPS vs. QXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. | -8.38% | 142.11% | -30.60% | 115.67% | -59.57% | -35.36% | 4.55% | -46.62% | -49.29% | 18.49% |
QXO QXO, Inc | -14.77% | 21.32% | -86.06% | 508.46% | -33.78% | 63.72% | -17.22% | 92.05% | -45.15% | 43.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPS and QXO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2012 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, CPS and QXO have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CPS:
$540.54M
QXO:
$122.38M
CPS:
-$1.84K
QXO:
-$1.03
CPS:
0.00
QXO:
0.96
CPS:
$688.43B
QXO:
$8.56B
CPS:
$82.66B
QXO:
$1.98B
CPS:
$202.33M
QXO:
-$152.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPS vs. QXO — Risk / Return Rank
CPS
QXO
CPS vs. QXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS) and QXO, Inc (QXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPS | QXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | -0.02 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 0.45 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.05 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | -0.03 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | -0.06 | +2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPS | QXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | -0.02 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | -0.13 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | 0.06 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.05 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
CPS vs. QXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPS drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, roughly equal to the maximum QXO drawdown of -95.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPS and QXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPS | QXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.44% | -95.44% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.46% | -41.08% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.93% | -95.44% | +45.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.34% | -95.44% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.44% | -95.44% | -2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.23% | -93.02% | +13.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.78% | -56.34% | +10.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.67% | 19.82% | +0.85% |
Volatility
CPS vs. QXO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS) is 13.92%, while QXO, Inc (QXO) has a volatility of 16.10%. This indicates that CPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QXO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPS | QXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.92% | 16.10% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.71% | 46.44% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.69% | 60.14% | +4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.71% | 145.36% | -58.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.79% | 123.57% | -45.78% |
Dividends
CPS vs. QXO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPS nor QXO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QXO QXO, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 164.53% | 1.17% | 0.00% | 13.42% | 31.47% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 1.89% | 2.00% |
Financials
CPS vs. QXO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. and QXO, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CPS vs. QXO - Profitability Comparison
CPS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 82.42B and revenue of 686.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.0%.
QXO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QXO, Inc reported a gross profit of 409.30M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.7%.
CPS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 28.69M and revenue of 686.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
QXO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QXO, Inc reported an operating income of -251.90M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of -14.6%.
CPS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -33.30B and revenue of 686.36B, resulting in a net margin of -4.9%.
QXO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QXO, Inc reported a net income of -227.10M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of -13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPS and QXO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QXO has higher volatility (16.10%) compared to CPS (13.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPS dropped -97.44% vs QXO's -95.44%.
CPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPS and QXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer