CPK vs. SNA
CPK (Chesapeake Utilities Corporation) and SNA (Snap-on Incorporated) are both stocks. CPK operates in Utilities - Regulated Gas (Utilities), while SNA operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CPK returned 9.34%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for SNA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPK vs. SNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPK achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than SNA's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CPK has underperformed SNA with an annualized return of 9.34%, while SNA has yielded a comparatively higher 12.41% annualized return.
CPK
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 0.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
SNA
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
CPK vs. SNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | -0.45% | 5.07% | 17.44% | -8.83% | -17.61% | 36.78% | 15.15% | 19.88% | 5.37% | 19.34% |
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 13.93% | 4.28% | 20.67% | 29.70% | 8.91% | 28.83% | 4.03% | 19.54% | -14.86% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPK and SNA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CPK and SNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CPK:
$2.97B
SNA:
$20.42B
CPK:
$3.21
SNA:
$19.35
CPK:
38.50
SNA:
20.03
CPK:
6.11
SNA:
3.04
CPK:
4.93
SNA:
4.00
CPK:
1.80K
SNA:
3.43
CPK:
$586.05M
SNA:
$5.12B
CPK:
$313.50M
SNA:
$2.63B
CPK:
$224.92M
SNA:
$1.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPK vs. SNA — Risk / Return Rank
CPK
SNA
CPK vs. SNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and Snap-on Incorporated (SNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPK | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.21 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 2.93 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | 7.51 | -6.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPK vs. SNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPK drawdown since its inception was -44.54%, smaller than the maximum SNA drawdown of -65.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPK and SNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPK | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.54% | -65.76% | +21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -8.47% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.17% | -20.77% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.67% | -20.77% | -17.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.67% | -47.38% | +8.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -0.16% | -10.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -13.87% | +5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.14% | 3.36% | +2.78% |
Volatility
CPK vs. SNA - Volatility Comparison
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) at 5.51%. This indicates that CPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPK | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 5.51% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 14.82% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.84% | 21.36% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 23.91% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 27.18% | -0.53% |
Dividends
CPK vs. SNA - Dividend Comparison
CPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than SNA's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2.22% | 2.16% | 2.07% | 2.18% | 1.76% | 1.29% | 1.59% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% |
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.27% | 2.33% | 2.57% | 2.37% | 2.61% | 2.32% | 2.35% | 1.69% | 1.48% | 1.28% |
Financials
CPK vs. SNA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Snap-on Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CPK vs. SNA - Profitability Comparison
CPK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 353.10K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SNA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a gross profit of 608.30M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.4%.
CPK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported an operating income of 99.40K and revenue of 353.10K, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.
SNA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported an operating income of 250.80M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
CPK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a net income of 59.30K and revenue of 353.10K, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.
SNA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a net income of 247.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPK and SNA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPK has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to SNA (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPK dropped -44.54% vs SNA's -65.76%.
SNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPK and SNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer