PortfoliosLab logo
CPK vs. LNT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CPK and LNT is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CPK vs. LNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CPK:

0.49

LNT:

1.26

Sortino Ratio

CPK:

1.00

LNT:

1.81

Omega Ratio

CPK:

1.12

LNT:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

CPK:

0.53

LNT:

1.41

Martin Ratio

CPK:

2.72

LNT:

5.66

Ulcer Index

CPK:

4.99%

LNT:

4.56%

Daily Std Dev

CPK:

21.54%

LNT:

19.48%

Max Drawdown

CPK:

-38.67%

LNT:

-51.66%

Current Drawdown

CPK:

-10.04%

LNT:

-4.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPK:

$2.81B

LNT:

$15.85B

EPS

CPK:

$5.41

LNT:

$2.90

PE Ratio

CPK:

22.24

LNT:

21.28

PEG Ratio

CPK:

2.23

LNT:

1.97

PS Ratio

CPK:

3.34

LNT:

3.89

PB Ratio

CPK:

1.87

LNT:

2.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPK:

$839.99M

LNT:

$4.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPK:

$328.65M

LNT:

$1.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPK:

$308.95M

LNT:

$1.85B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPK achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than LNT's 7.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CPK having a 11.10% annualized return and LNT not far behind at 10.90%.


CPK

YTD

1.97%

1M

-7.78%

6M

-2.05%

1Y

10.37%

5Y*

10.13%

10Y*

11.10%

LNT

YTD

7.44%

1M

4.27%

6M

4.20%

1Y

24.33%

5Y*

9.84%

10Y*

10.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPK vs. LNT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPK is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPK is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPK is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPK is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPK is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPK is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

LNT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNT is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNT is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNT is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNT is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNT is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNT is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CPK vs. LNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CPK Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the LNT Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPK and LNT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CPK vs. LNT - Dividend Comparison

CPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than LNT's 3.16% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
2.08%2.07%2.18%1.76%1.29%1.59%1.65%1.77%1.63%1.80%2.00%2.15%
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
3.16%3.25%3.53%3.10%2.62%2.95%2.60%3.17%2.96%3.10%3.52%3.07%

Drawdowns

CPK vs. LNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPK drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, smaller than the maximum LNT drawdown of -51.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPK and LNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CPK vs. LNT - Volatility Comparison

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) at 6.79%. This indicates that CPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CPK vs. LNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Alliant Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
298.70M
1.13B
(CPK) Total Revenue
(LNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CPK vs. LNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Alliant Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
39.8%
44.2%
(CPK) Gross Margin
(LNT) Gross Margin
CPK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a gross profit of 119.00M and revenue of 298.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

LNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 498.00M and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

CPK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported an operating income of 86.80M and revenue of 298.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

LNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliant Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 257.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.8%.

CPK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a net income of 50.90M and revenue of 298.70M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.

LNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a net income of 213.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.