SNA vs. GFF
SNA (Snap-on Incorporated) and GFF (Griffon Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Tools & Accessories industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, SNA returned 13.00%/yr vs 21.59%/yr for GFF. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SNA vs. GFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNA achieves a 20.67% return, which is significantly higher than GFF's 17.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SNA has underperformed GFF with an annualized return of 13.00%, while GFF has yielded a comparatively higher 21.59% annualized return.
SNA
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 20.67%
- 1Y
- 32.70%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 16.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.87%
GFF
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 27.22%
- 5Y*
- 35.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.01M | $26.26M | $31.76M | |
| $183.06M | $155.75M | $139.62M |
SNA vs. GFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 20.67% | 4.28% | 20.67% | 29.70% | 8.91% | 28.83% | 4.03% | 19.54% | -14.86% | 3.64% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 17.59% | 4.42% | 17.97% | 83.96% | 36.91% | 41.60% | 1.83% | 97.74% | -44.92% | -21.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNA and GFF is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, SNA and GFF have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SNA:
$21.23B
GFF:
$3.95B
SNA:
$19.58
GFF:
$0.76
SNA:
20.96
GFF:
113.38
SNA:
3.19
GFF:
1.47
SNA:
4.27
GFF:
1.68
SNA:
3.57
GFF:
41.69
SNA:
$5.07B
GFF:
$2.35B
SNA:
$2.60B
GFF:
$1.00B
SNA:
$1.50B
GFF:
$245.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNA vs. GFF — Risk / Return Rank
SNA
GFF
SNA vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNA | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.07 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 0.26 | +3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 0.67 | +9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNA vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNA drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, smaller than the maximum GFF drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA and GFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNA | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -96.84% | +31.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.47% | -27.85% | +19.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -27.85% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -39.02% | +18.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.38% | -61.32% | +13.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -11.65% | +9.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -55.34% | +41.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 10.70% | -7.58% |
Volatility
SNA vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is 6.89%, while Griffon Corporation (GFF) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that SNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNA | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 9.79% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.97% | 27.77% | -11.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 37.36% | -16.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.82% | 41.26% | -17.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 45.51% | -18.32% |
Dividends
SNA vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison
SNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than GFF's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFF Griffon Corporation | 0.97% | 1.03% | 0.88% | 4.10% | 6.62% | 1.16% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 12.27% | 1.23% | 0.80% | 0.96% |
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 2.31% | 2.57% | 2.27% | 2.33% | 2.57% | 2.37% | 2.61% | 2.32% | 2.35% | 1.69% | 1.48% | 1.28% |
Financials
SNA vs. GFF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snap-on Incorporated and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNA vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison
SNA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a gross profit of 635.20M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.
GFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
SNA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported an operating income of 268.90M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
GFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
SNA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a net income of 260.60M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.
GFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNA and GFF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFF has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to SNA (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNA dropped -65.76% vs GFF's -96.84%.
SNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNA and GFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer