CPK vs. CMS
Compare and contrast key facts about Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS).
Performance
CPK vs. CMS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CPK vs. CMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 1.82% | 5.07% | 17.44% | -8.83% | -17.61% | 36.78% | 15.15% | 19.88% | 5.37% | 19.34% |
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 11.77% | 8.13% | 18.60% | -5.21% | 0.84% | 9.71% | -0.32% | 30.04% | 8.25% | 17.03% |
Fundamentals
CPK:
$2.97B
CMS:
$23.31B
CPK:
$5.97
CMS:
$3.57
CPK:
21.17
CMS:
21.73
CPK:
2.42
CMS:
2.73
CPK:
$1.23B
CMS:
$8.54B
CPK:
$397.40M
CMS:
$2.35B
CPK:
$357.20M
CMS:
$2.95B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPK achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than CMS's 11.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CPK having a 9.36% annualized return and CMS not far ahead at 9.41%.
CPK
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- -5.17%
- 1Y
- 0.57%
- 3Y*
- 1.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
CMS
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- 11.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPK vs. CMS — Risk / Return Rank
CPK
CMS
CPK vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPK | CMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | 0.39 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.18 | 0.62 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.08 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 0.91 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.12 | 1.70 | -1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPK | CMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 0.39 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.44 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.35 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CPK and CMS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CPK vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison
CPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than CMS's 2.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2.17% | 2.16% | 2.07% | 2.18% | 1.76% | 1.29% | 1.59% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% |
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 2.83% | 3.10% | 3.09% | 3.36% | 3.62% | 2.67% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
CPK vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPK drawdown since its inception was -44.54%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPK and CMS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPK | CMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.54% | -91.20% | +46.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.39% | -8.51% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.67% | -27.56% | -11.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.67% | -29.55% | -9.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.15% | -0.91% | -7.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -27.45% | +18.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.42% | 4.55% | +2.87% |
Volatility
CPK vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) at 5.46%. This indicates that CPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPK | CMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 5.46% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 11.15% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 16.71% | +3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 18.83% | +3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 20.65% | +6.06% |
Financials
CPK vs. CMS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CPK vs. CMS - Profitability Comparison
CPK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a gross profit of 119.00M and revenue of 557.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.
CMS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CPK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported an operating income of 73.80M and revenue of 557.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.
CMS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 435.00M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
CPK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a net income of 46.10M and revenue of 557.30M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
CMS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.