CPK vs. CMS
Compare and contrast key facts about Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CPK or CMS.
Key characteristics
| CPK | CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.80% | 5.34% |
| 1Y Return | -12.44% | 1.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.97% | 1.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.85% | 5.00% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.12% | 10.66% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.52 | 0.04 |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.06% | 18.89% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.50% | -91.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.28% | -12.18% |
Fundamentals
| CPK | CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $17.72B |
| EPS | $4.73 | $3.28 |
| PE Ratio | 22.23 | 18.09 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.41 | 2.23 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $670.60M | $7.35B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $240.40M | $2.76B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $238.27M | $2.48B |
Correlation
The correlation between CPK and CMS is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CPK vs. CMS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CPK achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than CMS's 5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CPK has outperformed CMS with an annualized return of 12.12%, while CMS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CPK vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CPK vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison
CPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than CMS's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2.23% | 2.18% | 1.76% | 1.29% | 1.59% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 2.15% | 2.53% |
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 3.26% | 3.36% | 2.91% | 2.67% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 3.22% | 3.11% | 3.81% |
Drawdowns
CPK vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPK drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPK and CMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CPK vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) at 5.18%. This indicates that CPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CPK vs. CMS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities