CPK vs. CMS
Compare and contrast key facts about Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CPK or CMS.
Correlation
The correlation between CPK and CMS is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CPK vs. CMS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CPK:
0.49
CMS:
0.95
CPK:
1.00
CMS:
1.45
CPK:
1.12
CMS:
1.18
CPK:
0.53
CMS:
1.27
CPK:
2.72
CMS:
4.35
CPK:
4.99%
CMS:
4.17%
CPK:
21.54%
CMS:
17.63%
CPK:
-38.67%
CMS:
-91.20%
CPK:
-10.04%
CMS:
-4.64%
Fundamentals
CPK:
$2.87B
CMS:
$21.38B
CPK:
$5.40
CMS:
$3.38
CPK:
22.80
CMS:
21.15
CPK:
2.36
CMS:
2.89
CPK:
3.42
CMS:
2.75
CPK:
1.98
CMS:
2.64
CPK:
$839.99M
CMS:
$7.79B
CPK:
$328.65M
CMS:
$3.05B
CPK:
$308.95M
CMS:
$3.15B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPK achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than CMS's 8.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CPK having a 11.12% annualized return and CMS not far behind at 10.94%.
CPK
1.97%
-9.14%
-2.05%
10.89%
9.83%
11.12%
CMS
8.89%
-1.24%
6.36%
16.54%
8.53%
10.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CPK vs. CMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CPK
CMS
CPK vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CPK vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison
CPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than CMS's 2.96% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.18% | 1.76% | 1.29% | 1.59% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 2.15% |
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 2.96% | 3.09% | 3.36% | 2.91% | 2.67% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 3.22% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
CPK vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPK drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPK and CMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
CPK vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) at 6.80%. This indicates that CPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
CPK vs. CMS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CPK vs. CMS - Profitability Comparison
CPK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a gross profit of 119.00M and revenue of 298.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.
CMS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.
CPK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported an operating income of 86.80M and revenue of 298.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.
CMS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 494.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
CPK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a net income of 50.90M and revenue of 298.70M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
CMS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 304.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.