CPK vs. AFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CPK or AFL.
Correlation
The correlation between CPK and AFL is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CPK vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CPK:
0.91
AFL:
1.45
CPK:
1.34
AFL:
1.83
CPK:
1.16
AFL:
1.30
CPK:
0.67
AFL:
2.39
CPK:
5.34
AFL:
7.61
CPK:
3.64%
AFL:
3.94%
CPK:
21.35%
AFL:
20.63%
CPK:
-38.67%
AFL:
-82.71%
CPK:
-13.08%
AFL:
-10.50%
Fundamentals
CPK:
$2.84B
AFL:
$57.08B
CPK:
$4.92
AFL:
$6.73
CPK:
25.44
AFL:
15.27
CPK:
2.40
AFL:
0.93
CPK:
$757.63M
AFL:
$17.30B
CPK:
$284.87M
AFL:
$17.30B
CPK:
$289.38M
AFL:
$382.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPK achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly lower than AFL's 27.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CPK has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 11.29%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return.
CPK
15.70%
-6.86%
15.00%
17.40%
6.13%
11.29%
AFL
27.16%
-6.85%
15.59%
29.18%
16.93%
15.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CPK vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CPK vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
CPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than AFL's 1.95% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2.10% | 2.18% | 1.76% | 1.29% | 1.59% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 2.15% | 2.53% |
Aflac Incorporated | 1.95% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.46% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
CPK vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPK drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPK and AFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CPK vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL) have volatilities of 6.29% and 6.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CPK vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities