PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CPK vs. AFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CPK and AFL is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

CPK vs. AFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.76%
13.96%
CPK
AFL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CPK:

1.20

AFL:

1.52

Sortino Ratio

CPK:

1.69

AFL:

1.89

Omega Ratio

CPK:

1.21

AFL:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

CPK:

0.87

AFL:

2.50

Martin Ratio

CPK:

6.10

AFL:

6.66

Ulcer Index

CPK:

4.13%

AFL:

4.71%

Daily Std Dev

CPK:

21.06%

AFL:

20.63%

Max Drawdown

CPK:

-38.67%

AFL:

-82.71%

Current Drawdown

CPK:

-9.98%

AFL:

-7.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPK:

$2.81B

AFL:

$59.16B

EPS

CPK:

$4.94

AFL:

$6.76

PE Ratio

CPK:

25.07

AFL:

15.75

PEG Ratio

CPK:

2.37

AFL:

0.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPK:

$572.29M

AFL:

$13.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPK:

$209.75M

AFL:

$13.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPK:

$222.40M

AFL:

$45.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPK achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than AFL's 2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CPK has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 11.39%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 16.55% annualized return.


CPK

YTD

2.04%

1M

3.57%

6M

6.09%

1Y

25.65%

5Y*

7.54%

10Y*

11.39%

AFL

YTD

2.95%

1M

3.70%

6M

13.74%

1Y

28.94%

5Y*

18.10%

10Y*

16.55%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPK vs. AFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPK is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPK is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPK is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPK is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPK is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPK is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

AFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFL is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFL is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFL is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFL is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFL is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFL is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CPK vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CPK, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.201.52
The chart of Sortino ratio for CPK, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.691.89
The chart of Omega ratio for CPK, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.211.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for CPK, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.872.50
The chart of Martin ratio for CPK, currently valued at 6.10, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.106.66
CPK
AFL

The current CPK Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the AFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPK and AFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.20
1.52
CPK
AFL

Dividends

CPK vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison

CPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than AFL's 1.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
2.03%2.07%2.18%1.76%1.29%1.59%1.65%1.77%1.63%1.80%2.00%2.15%
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
1.88%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%2.46%

Drawdowns

CPK vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPK drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPK and AFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.98%
-7.19%
CPK
AFL

Volatility

CPK vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 5.36%. This indicates that CPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.72%
5.36%
CPK
AFL

Financials

CPK vs. AFL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab