CPK vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CPK (Chesapeake Utilities Corporation) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, CPK returned 9.42%/yr vs 37.68%/yr for SMH. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CPK vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPK achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CPK has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 9.42%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.68% annualized return.

CPK

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -4.63%
• YTD: -2.81%
• 6M: -7.02%
• 1Y: 0.55%
• 3Y*: -0.36%
• 5Y*: 2.68%
• 10Y*: 9.42%

SMH

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 25.87%
• YTD: 77.13%
• 6M: 75.61%
• 1Y: 157.20%
• 3Y*: 64.17%
• 5Y*: 39.21%
• 10Y*: 37.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPK vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation	-2.81%	5.07%	17.44%	-8.83%	-17.61%	36.78%	15.15%	19.88%	5.37%	19.34%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	77.13%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CPK and SMH is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2000	0.17

The correlation between CPK and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CPK vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPK

CPK Risk / Return Rank: 38
CPK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
CPK Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CPK Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CPK Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CPK Martin Ratio Rank: 41

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPK vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPK	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	5.19	-5.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	5.22	-5.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.72	-0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	10.59	-10.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.09	40.63	-40.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPK vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPK Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPK and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPK	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	5.19	-5.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	1.13	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	1.16	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.34	-0.01

Drawdowns

CPK vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPK drawdown since its inception was -44.54%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPK and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPK	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.54%	-84.96%	+40.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-14.93%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.53%	-35.74%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.67%	-45.30%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.67%	-45.30%	+6.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.33%	0.00%	-12.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-41.09%	+32.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.90%	3.89%	+2.01%

Volatility

CPK vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is 5.22%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that CPK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPK	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	11.47%	-6.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	24.29%	-10.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.72%	30.56%	-11.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.78%	35.01%	-12.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.64%	32.57%	-5.93%

Dividends

CPK vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation	2.27%	2.16%	2.07%	2.18%	1.76%	1.29%	1.59%	1.65%	1.77%	1.63%	1.80%	2.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.17%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPK and SMH in my portfolio?

CPK and SMH have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPK or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to CPK (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPK dropped -44.54% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.