COYY vs. PLTM
COYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - COYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). COYY is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.
Performance
COYY vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -32.25% return, which is significantly lower than PLTM's -23.72% return.
COYY
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -8.79%
- YTD
- -32.25%
- 6M
- -37.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM
- 1D
- -5.11%
- 1M
- -18.52%
- YTD
- -23.72%
- 6M
- -30.39%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- —
COYY vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | -32.25% | -40.04% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -23.72% | 48.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between COYY and PLTM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COYY vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank
COYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTM
COYY vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COYY vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and PLTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -43.65% | -16.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -43.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.11% | -43.65% | -16.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.53% | -18.67% | -17.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.57% | — |
Volatility
COYY vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.38% | 51.58% | -16.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.38% | 33.07% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.38% | 31.14% | +4.24% |
COYY vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
COYY vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 423.17%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | 423.17% | 132.14% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COYY and PLTM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.
COYY has the higher dividend yield at 423.17%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
COYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for COYY and 0.50% for PLTM.
Find the right allocation for COYY and PLTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer