PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COYY vs. TSYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COYY vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -32.55% return, which is significantly lower than TSYY's -23.02% return.


COYY

1D
-3.58%
1M
-1.27%
6M
-19.84%
YTD
-32.55%
1Y
-56.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-59.38%

TSYY

1D
0.67%
1M
-6.99%
6M
-22.45%
YTD
-23.02%
1Y
-9.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-25.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$328.65K$310.41K$590.67K
$760.06K$828.41K$1.81M

COYY vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF
-32.55%-40.04%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
-23.02%9.59%

Correlation

The correlation between COYY and TSYY is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COYY vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COYY
COYY Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
COYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
COYY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
COYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
COYY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TSYY
TSYY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TSYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSYY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TSYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSYY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COYY vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COYYTSYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.63

0.95

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.01

-0.38

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

-0.70

-0.73

COYY vs. TSYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COYY Sharpe Ratio is -1.77, which is lower than the TSYY Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COYY and TSYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COYY vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -42.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and TSYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COYYTSYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.85%

-42.66%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.62%

-33.02%

-26.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.29%

-41.57%

-18.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.89%

-27.05%

-11.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.81%

18.04%

+25.77%

Volatility

COYY vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) is 5.36%, while GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that COYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COYYTSYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

6.96%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.43%

17.02%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.16%

29.54%

+4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.10%

36.41%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.10%

36.41%

-2.31%

COYY vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TSYY's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

COYY vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison

COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 472.52%, more than TSYY's 256.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
COYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF
442.76%132.14%0.00%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
246.79%256.64%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


COYY and TSYY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSYY has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to COYY (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COYY dropped -60.85% vs TSYY's -42.66%.

On 1-year performance, TSYY leads with -9.90% vs -56.54% for COYY. On fees, COYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, COYY has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSYY has performed better with a -9.90% return vs -56.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.

COYY has the higher dividend yield at 442.76%, compared with 246.79% for TSYY.

Their fees differ too: 1.07% for COYY and 1.15% for TSYY.

TSYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COYY and TSYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer