PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWZ vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COWZ vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than IVOV's 8.98% return.


COWZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*

IVOV

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.98%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWZ vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.18%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
8.98%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and IVOV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.87

The correlation between COWZ and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

COWZ vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COWZ
IVOV

Healthcare

21.8%
3.5%

Energy

16.9%
7.4%

Technology

16.0%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
5.5%

Communication Services

10.4%
0.5%

Industrials

8.4%
18.8%

Basic Materials

3.7%
6.0%

Financial Services

-

21.9%

Real Estate

-

9.6%

Utilities

-

4.2%

Healthcare

COWZ
21.8%
IVOV
3.5%

Energy

COWZ
16.9%
IVOV
7.4%

Technology

COWZ
16.0%
IVOV
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

COWZ
11.7%
IVOV
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

COWZ
10.9%
IVOV
5.5%

Communication Services

COWZ
10.4%
IVOV
0.5%

Industrials

COWZ
8.4%
IVOV
18.8%

Basic Materials

COWZ
3.7%
IVOV
6.0%

Financial Services

COWZ

-

IVOV
21.9%

Real Estate

COWZ

-

IVOV
9.6%

Utilities

COWZ

-

IVOV
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COWZ vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWZ vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COWZIVOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

1.37

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

2.08

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

1.97

+2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.19

6.80

+5.39

COWZ vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWZ and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COWZIVOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.37

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.39

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.58

+0.07

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, smaller than the maximum IVOV drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COWZIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.63%

-45.99%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-10.58%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-22.61%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-22.61%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.31%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-5.43%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

3.07%

-1.24%

Volatility

COWZ vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 2.56%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COWZIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

4.07%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

10.61%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

15.27%

-4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

19.48%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

21.73%

-1.80%

COWZ vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

COWZ vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than IVOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.99%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.67%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


COWZ and IVOV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs 7.51% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.

COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.10% for IVOV.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWZ and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer