PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWS vs. MDYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COWS vs. MDYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with COWS having a 9.22% return and MDYV slightly lower at 9.04%.


COWS

1D
-0.63%
1M
5.01%
YTD
9.22%
6M
9.70%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MDYV

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.78%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.24%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWS vs. MDYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
9.22%15.29%11.08%9.28%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
9.04%7.45%11.48%11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between COWS and MDYV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

0.88

The correlation between COWS and MDYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

COWS vs. MDYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COWS
MDYV

Technology

21.0%
9.3%

Industrials

18.7%
18.8%

Financial Services

17.2%
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
13.5%

Energy

8.2%
7.4%

Healthcare

8.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

6.0%
6.0%

Communication Services

4.7%
0.5%

Utilities

2.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
5.5%

Real Estate

-

9.6%

Technology

COWS
21.0%
MDYV
9.3%

Industrials

COWS
18.7%
MDYV
18.8%

Financial Services

COWS
17.2%
MDYV
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

COWS
10.9%
MDYV
13.5%

Energy

COWS
8.2%
MDYV
7.4%

Healthcare

COWS
8.0%
MDYV
3.5%

Basic Materials

COWS
6.0%
MDYV
6.0%

Communication Services

COWS
4.7%
MDYV
0.5%

Utilities

COWS
2.8%
MDYV
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

COWS
2.4%
MDYV
5.5%

Real Estate

COWS

-

MDYV
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COWS vs. MDYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWS
COWS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
COWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWS vs. MDYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COWSMDYVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.37

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

2.07

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

1.97

+2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.35

6.78

+7.56

COWS vs. MDYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the MDYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWS and MDYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COWSMDYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.37

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.41

+0.49

Drawdowns

COWS vs. MDYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum MDYV drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and MDYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COWSMDYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.76%

-60.71%

+35.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-10.53%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.38%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-8.62%

+4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

3.06%

-0.95%

Volatility

COWS vs. MDYV - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) at 3.93%. This indicates that COWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COWSMDYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

3.93%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

10.56%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

15.25%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

19.50%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

21.90%

-3.05%

COWS vs. MDYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MDYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

COWS vs. MDYV - Dividend Comparison

COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than MDYV's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
1.60%2.04%2.08%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


COWS and MDYV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to MDYV (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWS dropped -24.76% vs MDYV's -60.71%.

On 1-year performance, COWS leads with 30.18% vs 20.68% for MDYV. On fees, COWS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COWS has performed better with a 30.18% return vs 20.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.60% for COWS.

COWS tracks Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index, while MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for COWS and 0.15% for MDYV.

COWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWS and MDYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer