COTG vs. KQQQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while KQQQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for KQQQ.

Performance

COTG vs. KQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than KQQQ's 16.99% return.

COTG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -15.48%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 16.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KQQQ

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 16.99%
• 6M: 16.94%
• 1Y: 39.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. KQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	14.10%	-22.61%
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	16.99%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between COTG and KQQQ is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

COTG vs. KQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KQQQ

KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTG vs. KQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COTG	KQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.04	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.71	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.40	—

Drawdowns

COTG vs. KQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, roughly equal to the maximum KQQQ drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and KQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	COTG	KQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.69%	-26.15%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.58%	-2.86%	-22.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.64%	-4.69%	-4.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COTG	KQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.09%	19.32%	+20.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.09%	23.66%	+16.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.09%	23.66%	+16.43%

COTG vs. KQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than KQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

COTG vs. KQQQ - Dividend Comparison

COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	13.98%	12.01%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COTG and KQQQ in my portfolio?

COTG and KQQQ have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COTG or KQQQ?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COTG or KQQQ?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COTG or KQQQ?

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.98%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

What is the main difference between COTG and KQQQ?

COTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KQQQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.99% for KQQQ.