COSW vs. VGT
COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COSW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. COSW is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. COSW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
COSW vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.32% return.
COSW
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 22.32%
- 6M
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 43.06%
- 3Y*
- 29.77%
- 5Y*
- 19.33%
- 10Y*
- 25.39%
COSW vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 11.78% | -10.48% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.32% | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between COSW and VGT is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | -0.22 |
COSW vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COSW
VGT
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
COSW
VGT
-
Basic Materials
COSW
-
VGT
Communication Services
COSW
-
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
COSW
-
VGT
Energy
COSW
-
VGT
Financial Services
COSW
-
VGT
Healthcare
COSW
-
VGT
Industrials
COSW
-
VGT
Real Estate
COSW
-
VGT
-
Technology
COSW
-
VGT
Utilities
COSW
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COSW vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
COSW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGT
COSW vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COSW | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COSW vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COSW | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | -54.63% | +38.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.89% | -8.46% | -6.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -7.95% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.39% | — |
Volatility
COSW vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COSW | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 22.73% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 25.55% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 24.76% | +0.70% |
COSW vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
COSW vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.61%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 19.61% | 4.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COSW and VGT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.
COSW has the higher dividend yield at 19.61%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
COSW is categorized as Derivative Income, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for COSW and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer