PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSW vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSW vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.32% return.


COSW

1D
0.24%
1M
-8.28%
YTD
11.78%
6M
10.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGT

1D
-0.81%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
22.32%
6M
20.31%
1Y
43.06%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
19.33%
10Y*
25.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
11.78%-10.48%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.32%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between COSW and VGT is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025

-0.22

COSW vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COSW
VGT

Consumer Defensive

8.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

98.5%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

COSW
8.4%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

COSW

-

VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

COSW

-

VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

COSW

-

VGT
0.1%

Energy

COSW

-

VGT
0.3%

Financial Services

COSW

-

VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

COSW

-

VGT
0.0%

Industrials

COSW

-

VGT
0.4%

Real Estate

COSW

-

VGT

-

Technology

COSW

-

VGT
98.5%

Utilities

COSW

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSW vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSW vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COSWVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

COSW vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COSW vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSWVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-54.63%

+38.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.89%

-8.46%

-6.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-7.95%

+3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

Volatility

COSW vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSWVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.46%

22.73%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.46%

25.55%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.46%

24.76%

+0.70%

COSW vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSW vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.61%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
19.61%4.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSW and VGT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 19.61%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

COSW is categorized as Derivative Income, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.09% for VGT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSW and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer