COSW vs. ROCY
COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) and ROCY (JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. COSW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ROCY.
Performance
COSW vs. ROCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COSW
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROCY
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COSW vs. ROCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | -0.64% |
ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF | 8.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between COSW and ROCY is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COSW vs. ROCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COSW | ROCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 4.05 | -3.95 |
Drawdowns
COSW vs. ROCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, which is greater than ROCY's maximum drawdown of -3.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and ROCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COSW | ROCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | -3.35% | -12.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.37% | -2.22% | -11.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -0.37% | -3.92% |
Volatility
COSW vs. ROCY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COSW | ROCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.99% | 11.95% | +14.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 11.95% | +14.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 11.95% | +14.04% |
COSW vs. ROCY - Expense Ratio Comparison
COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ROCY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
COSW vs. ROCY - Dividend Comparison
COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.86%, more than ROCY's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 17.86% | 4.96% |
ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF | 1.65% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COSW and ROCY have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROCY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROCY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.
COSW has the higher dividend yield at 17.86%, compared with 1.65% for ROCY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.35% for ROCY.
Find the right allocation for COSW and ROCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer