PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSW vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSW vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 5.65% return.


COSW

1D
0.14%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
13.78%
6M
8.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYI

1D
-2.24%
1M
0.20%
YTD
5.65%
6M
5.99%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
13.78%-10.71%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
5.65%2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between COSW and SPYI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

-0.04

COSW vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COSW
SPYI

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

-

35.5%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

COSW
7.9%
SPYI
4.9%

Basic Materials

COSW

-

SPYI
1.8%

Communication Services

COSW

-

SPYI
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

COSW

-

SPYI
10.1%

Energy

COSW

-

SPYI
3.5%

Financial Services

COSW

-

SPYI
11.8%

Healthcare

COSW

-

SPYI
8.5%

Industrials

COSW

-

SPYI
8.4%

Real Estate

COSW

-

SPYI
2.0%

Technology

COSW

-

SPYI
35.5%

Utilities

COSW

-

SPYI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSW vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSW

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSW vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COSW vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COSWSPYIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

1.16

-1.06

Drawdowns

COSW vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYI drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and SPYI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSWSPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-16.47%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.37%

-2.40%

-10.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-1.80%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

Volatility

COSW vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSWSPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.99%

9.90%

+16.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.99%

12.96%

+13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.99%

12.96%

+13.03%

COSW vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSW vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.86%, more than SPYI's 11.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
17.86%4.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
11.87%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSW and SPYI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 17.86%, compared with 11.87% for SPYI.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.68% for SPYI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSW and SPYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer