COSW vs. QDTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. COSW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.

Performance

COSW vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.58% return.

COSW

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -6.40%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 2.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDTE

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 8.99%
• YTD: 16.58%
• 6M: 16.20%
• 1Y: 40.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	12.13%	-10.71%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.58%	3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between COSW and QDTE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	-0.09

COSW vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COSW	QDTE
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	5.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

COSW vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 78
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSW vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COSW	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	1.30	-1.30

Drawdowns

COSW vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	COSW	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.24%	-22.86%	+6.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.62%	-0.16%	-14.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-3.14%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COSW	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.10%	14.81%	+11.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.10%	18.43%	+7.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.10%	18.43%	+7.67%

COSW vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

COSW vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, less than QDTE's 42.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	18.13%	4.96%	0.00%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	42.16%	49.49%	32.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COSW and QDTE in my portfolio?

COSW and QDTE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COSW or QDTE?

On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COSW or QDTE?

QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COSW or QDTE?

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 42.16%, compared with 18.13% for COSW.

What is the main difference between COSW and QDTE?

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.97% for QDTE.