PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSW vs. MAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSW vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than MAGX's 1.49% return.


COSW

1D
0.92%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
12.13%
6M
2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGX

1D
-2.59%
1M
3.29%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.41%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COSW and MAGX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

-0.18

COSW vs. MAGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COSW
MAGX

Consumer Defensive

7.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

25.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

COSW
7.9%
MAGX

-

Basic Materials

COSW

-

MAGX

-

Communication Services

COSW

-

MAGX

-

Consumer Cyclical

COSW

-

MAGX

-

Energy

COSW

-

MAGX

-

Financial Services

COSW

-

MAGX
25.0%

Healthcare

COSW

-

MAGX

-

Industrials

COSW

-

MAGX

-

Real Estate

COSW

-

MAGX

-

Technology

COSW

-

MAGX

-

Utilities

COSW

-

MAGX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSW vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSW

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSW vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COSW vs. MAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COSWMAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.85

-0.84

Drawdowns

COSW vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum MAGX drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and MAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSWMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-54.19%

+37.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-7.49%

-7.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-13.78%

+9.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.09%

Volatility

COSW vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSWMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.10%

39.88%

-13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

53.52%

-27.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.10%

53.52%

-27.42%

COSW vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSW vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, more than MAGX's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
18.13%4.96%0.00%
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
2.02%2.05%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSW and MAGX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.

COSW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.95% for MAGX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSW and MAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer