PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSW vs. FBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSW vs. FBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than FBY's -5.84% return.


COSW

1D
0.92%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
12.13%
6M
2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBY

1D
3.88%
1M
2.31%
YTD
-5.84%
6M
-4.65%
1Y
-6.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
12.13%-10.71%
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
-5.84%-10.22%

Correlation

The correlation between COSW and FBY is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSW vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSW

FBY
FBY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSW vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COSW vs. FBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COSWFBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.64

-0.63

Drawdowns

COSW vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum FBY drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and FBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSWFBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-31.53%

+15.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-19.08%

+4.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-7.82%

+3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.41%

Volatility

COSW vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSWFBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.10%

28.89%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

28.53%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.10%

28.53%

-2.43%

COSW vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COSW and FBY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

COSW vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, less than FBY's 55.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
18.13%4.96%0.00%0.00%
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
55.74%55.43%53.89%8.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSW and FBY have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COSW and FBY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 55.74%, compared with 18.13% for COSW.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSW and FBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer