PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSW vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.90% return.


COSW

1D
0.92%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
12.13%
6M
2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
12.13%-10.71%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.90%0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between COSW and BUCK is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.09

COSW vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COSW
BUCK

Consumer Defensive

7.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

COSW
7.9%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

COSW

-

BUCK

-

Communication Services

COSW

-

BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

COSW

-

BUCK

-

Energy

COSW

-

BUCK

-

Financial Services

COSW

-

BUCK
100.0%

Healthcare

COSW

-

BUCK

-

Industrials

COSW

-

BUCK

-

Real Estate

COSW

-

BUCK

-

Technology

COSW

-

BUCK

-

Utilities

COSW

-

BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSW

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COSW vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COSWBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

1.47

-1.46

Drawdowns

COSW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSWBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-5.43%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-0.04%

-14.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-0.49%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

COSW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSWBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.10%

3.14%

+22.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

3.49%

+22.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.10%

3.49%

+22.61%

COSW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
18.13%4.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSW and BUCK have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

COSW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.35% for BUCK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSW and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer