COPX vs. RING
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COPX returned 21.86%/yr vs 13.85%/yr for RING. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.
Performance
COPX vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly higher than RING's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, COPX has outperformed RING with an annualized return of 21.86%, while RING has yielded a comparatively lower 13.85% annualized return.
COPX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 29.13%
- 1Y
- 106.27%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.86%
RING
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -14.81%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 54.08%
- 3Y*
- 44.87%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.85%
COPX vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 19.75% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | -5.54% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 12.29% | -15.40% | -7.46% | 24.98% | 49.92% | -13.14% | 10.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and RING is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, COPX and RING have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.
COPX vs. RING - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COPX
RING
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
COPX
RING
Industrials
COPX
RING
-
Communication Services
COPX
-
RING
-
Consumer Cyclical
COPX
-
RING
-
Consumer Defensive
COPX
-
RING
-
Energy
COPX
-
RING
-
Financial Services
COPX
-
RING
-
Healthcare
COPX
-
RING
-
Real Estate
COPX
-
RING
-
Technology
COPX
-
RING
-
Utilities
COPX
-
RING
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
RING
COPX vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 1.59 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | 4.45 | +7.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPX vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, roughly equal to the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and RING.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -79.47% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -35.72% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -35.72% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -47.94% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | -52.04% | -13.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -30.03% | +19.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.28% | -47.36% | +8.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 12.74% | -3.76% |
Volatility
COPX vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 16.83%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 16.83% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.15% | 39.11% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.66% | 47.31% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.00% | 36.81% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.75% | 36.70% | -0.95% |
COPX vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than RING's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.24% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.89% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPX and RING have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to RING (16.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs RING's -79.47%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.86% vs 13.85% for RING. On fees, RING is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RING has been the lower-risk option at 16.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 13.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RING is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.89% for RING.
COPX is categorized as Copper, while RING is Gold. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.39% for RING.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPX and RING
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer