COPP vs. BATT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COPP (Sprott Copper Miners ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. COPP is passively managed, while BATT is actively managed. Over the past year, COPP returned 111.49% vs 103.56% for BATT. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COPP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.

Performance

COPP vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with COPP having a 26.69% return and BATT slightly lower at 26.16%.

COPP

• 1D: -3.50%
• 1M: 22.98%
• YTD: 26.69%
• 6M: 39.51%
• 1Y: 111.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATT

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 26.16%
• 6M: 29.61%
• 1Y: 103.56%
• 3Y*: 14.36%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPP vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	26.69%	74.02%	4.18%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	26.16%	59.70%	-0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between COPP and BATT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.76

The correlation between COPP and BATT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

COPP vs. BATT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COPP	BATT
Basic Materials	92.0%	57.0%
Financial Services	0.9%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	18.9%
Industrials	0.1%	16.9%
Energy	0.1%	-
Technology	0.1%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	-
Healthcare	0.1%	-
Communication Services	0.1%	0.0%
Utilities	0.1%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

COPP vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPP

COPP Risk / Return Rank: 70
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 61
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 87
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPP vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COPP	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	3.38	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.69	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.50	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	6.12	-2.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.39	22.20	-8.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COPP vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPP Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPP and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COPP	BATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	3.38	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	0.01	+1.10

Drawdowns

COPP vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPP drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPP	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.37%	-69.38%	+25.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.91%	-17.03%	-11.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-47.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.50%	-3.44%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.02%	-34.78%	+20.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.35%	4.68%	+3.67%

Volatility

COPP vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) has a higher volatility of 15.22% compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) at 10.29%. This indicates that COPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPP	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.22%	10.29%	+4.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.30%	24.67%	+11.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.84%	30.80%	+12.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.80%	29.57%	+11.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.80%	30.60%	+10.20%

COPP vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPP vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

COPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than BATT's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.47%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	1.87%	2.37%	2.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPP and BATT in my portfolio?

COPP and BATT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COPP or BATT?

COPP has higher volatility (15.22%) compared to BATT (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPP dropped -44.37% vs BATT's -69.38%.

Which ETF is better, COPP or BATT?

On 1-year performance, COPP leads with 111.49% vs 103.56% for BATT. On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BATT has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COPP or BATT?

Over the 1-year period, COPP has performed better with a 111.49% return vs 103.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPP or BATT?

BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPP or BATT?

COPP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.47% for BATT.

What is the main difference between COPP and BATT?

They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPP and 0.59% for BATT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.