PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPP vs. SCCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPP vs. SCCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPP achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly lower than SCCO's 36.12% return.


COPP

1D
-1.28%
1M
4.93%
YTD
19.28%
6M
21.19%
1Y
97.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCCO

1D
-1.57%
1M
5.70%
YTD
36.12%
6M
32.69%
1Y
115.90%
3Y*
45.44%
5Y*
31.42%
10Y*
27.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPP vs. SCCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
19.28%74.02%4.25%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
36.12%66.62%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between COPP and SCCO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2024

0.88

The correlation between COPP and SCCO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPP vs. SCCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPP
COPP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCCO
SCCO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SCCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPP vs. SCCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPPSCCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.86

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

10.88

+0.47

COPP vs. SCCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPP Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the SCCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPP and SCCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COPP vs. SCCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPP drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, smaller than the maximum SCCO drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP and SCCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPPSCCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.37%

-78.60%

+34.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.91%

-30.22%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.15%

-11.90%

+2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.89%

-22.03%

+8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.61%

10.69%

-2.08%

Volatility

COPP vs. SCCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) is 17.34%, while Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) has a volatility of 18.62%. This indicates that COPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPPSCCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.34%

18.62%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.75%

41.41%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.90%

49.73%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.44%

39.86%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.44%

37.55%

+3.89%

Dividends

COPP vs. SCCO - Dividend Comparison

COPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than SCCO's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
1.98%2.37%2.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
1.92%2.13%2.29%4.65%5.80%5.19%2.30%4.81%4.55%1.24%0.56%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPP and SCCO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCCO has higher volatility (18.62%) compared to COPP (17.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPP dropped -44.37% vs SCCO's -78.60%.

SCCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPP and SCCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer