CON vs. PECO
CON (Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc) and PECO (Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.) are both stocks. CON operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while PECO operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past year, CON returned 59.47% vs 26.24% for PECO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CON vs. PECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CON achieves a 60.33% return, which is significantly higher than PECO's 20.52% return.
CON
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 53.10%
- YTD
- 60.33%
- 1Y
- 59.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PECO
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 22.59%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 1Y
- 26.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CON vs. PECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CON Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc | 60.33% | 0.64% | -9.81% |
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 20.52% | -1.59% | 11.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CON and PECO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
CON:
$4.02B
PECO:
$5.31B
CON:
$2.08
PECO:
$1.31
CON:
15.07
PECO:
32.14
CON:
1.20
PECO:
5.02
CON:
$2.23B
PECO:
$739.02M
CON:
$639.91M
PECO:
$525.25M
CON:
$374.33M
PECO:
$502.64M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CON vs. PECO — Risk / Return Rank
CON
PECO
CON vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc (CON) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CON | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.41 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 8.35 | -2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CON vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CON drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, roughly equal to the maximum PECO drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CON and PECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CON | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -23.11% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.39% | -7.74% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.45% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -6.39% | -3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.96% | 3.15% | +6.81% |
Volatility
CON vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison
Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc (CON) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 4.66%. This indicates that CON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CON | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 4.66% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 11.43% | +6.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.81% | 15.65% | +11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 22.50% | +7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 22.50% | +7.10% |
Dividends
CON vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison
CON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than PECO's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc | 0.80% | 1.27% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 3.06% | 3.52% | 3.18% | 3.12% | 3.43% | 1.33% |
Financials
CON vs. PECO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CON vs. PECO - Profitability Comparison
CON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc reported a gross profit of 170.47M and revenue of 569.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.9%.
PECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 135.68M and revenue of 190.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.1%.
CON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc reported an operating income of 69.00K and revenue of 569.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.21M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.5%.
CON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc reported a net income of 50.49M and revenue of 569.56M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
PECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.38M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CON and PECO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CON has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to PECO (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CON dropped -22.59% vs PECO's -23.11%.
CON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CON and PECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer