PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIG vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIG vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -61.94% return, which is significantly lower than HOOG's -55.34% return.


COIG

1D
-0.23%
1M
-34.67%
YTD
-61.94%
6M
-74.70%
1Y
-78.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
12.78%
1M
23.20%
YTD
-55.34%
6M
-70.69%
1Y
-21.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIG vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COIG and HOOG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025

0.75

The correlation between COIG and HOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIG vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIG vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COIGHOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.09

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-0.25

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

-0.40

-0.79

COIG vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIG and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIGHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

-0.16

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.41

-0.81

Drawdowns

COIG vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -92.06%, which is greater than HOOG's maximum drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIGHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.06%

-86.94%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.06%

-86.94%

-5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.44%

-79.17%

-12.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.83%

-37.70%

-14.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.13%

53.46%

+12.67%

Volatility

COIG vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) is 37.76%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 43.09%. This indicates that COIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIGHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.76%

43.09%

-5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.15%

101.33%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.95%

137.25%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.21%

145.07%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.21%

145.07%

+1.14%

COIG vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COIG and HOOG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

COIG vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.55%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COIG and HOOG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (43.09%) compared to COIG (37.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -92.06% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

On 1-year performance, HOOG leads with -21.60% vs -78.85% for COIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, COIG has been the lower-risk option at 37.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOG has performed better with a -21.60% return vs -78.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIG and HOOG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIG and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer