COIG vs. CSCL
COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) and CSCL (Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, COIG returned -91.14% vs 168.92% for CSCL. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for CSCL.
Performance
COIG vs. CSCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -66.33% return, which is significantly lower than CSCL's 122.84% return.
COIG
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- 6M
- -69.95%
- YTD
- -66.33%
- 1Y
- -91.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSCL
- 1D
- 5.31%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- 140.54%
- YTD
- 122.84%
- 1Y
- 168.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIG vs. CSCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -66.33% | -67.79% |
CSCL Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares | 122.84% | 20.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIG and CSCL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIG vs. CSCL — Risk / Return Rank
COIG
CSCL
COIG vs. CSCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COIG | CSCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.40 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 5.93 | -6.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 13.47 | -14.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COIG vs. CSCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -93.79%, which is greater than CSCL's maximum drawdown of -27.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and CSCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIG | CSCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.79% | -27.41% | -66.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.79% | -27.41% | -66.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.43% | -14.47% | -77.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.60% | -9.33% | -45.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.95% | 12.07% | +59.88% |
Volatility
COIG vs. CSCL - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a higher volatility of 33.74% compared to Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) at 20.67%. This indicates that COIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIG | CSCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.74% | 20.67% | +13.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 103.75% | 57.74% | +46.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.85% | 64.27% | +69.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.71% | 63.26% | +81.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.71% | 63.26% | +81.45% |
COIG vs. CSCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CSCL's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIG vs. CSCL - Dividend Comparison
COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSCL Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares | 1.14% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIG and CSCL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIG has higher volatility (33.74%) compared to CSCL (20.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -93.79% vs CSCL's -27.41%.
On 1-year performance, CSCL leads with 168.92% vs -91.14% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CSCL has been the lower-risk option at 20.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSCL has performed better with a 168.92% return vs -91.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for CSCL.
CSCL has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COIG and 1.07% for CSCL.
CSCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COIG and CSCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer