PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COFYX vs. CBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COFYX vs. CBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) and Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COFYX achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than CBALX's 6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, COFYX has outperformed CBALX with an annualized return of 15.51%, while CBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.10% annualized return.


COFYX

1D
0.05%
1M
6.23%
YTD
10.51%
6M
10.85%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
15.51%

CBALX

1D
0.05%
1M
4.12%
YTD
6.82%
6M
7.03%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COFYX vs. CBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COFYX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class
10.51%17.49%23.49%32.22%-18.51%24.34%22.37%40.31%-8.79%20.61%
CBALX
Columbia Balanced Fund
6.82%14.14%14.60%21.49%-16.63%14.92%17.91%23.05%-5.75%14.29%

Correlation

The correlation between COFYX and CBALX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012

0.98

The correlation between COFYX and CBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COFYX vs. CBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COFYX
COFYX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
COFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
COFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
COFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
COFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CBALX
CBALX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COFYX vs. CBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) and Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COFYXCBALXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

2.39

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

3.38

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.96

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.85

12.71

-0.86

COFYX vs. CBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COFYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the CBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COFYX and CBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COFYXCBALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.39

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.77

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.89

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.71

+0.18

Drawdowns

COFYX vs. CBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COFYX drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, smaller than the maximum CBALX drawdown of -34.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFYX and CBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COFYXCBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.43%

-34.53%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-6.63%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-12.06%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-20.91%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.43%

-22.73%

-9.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-5.31%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

1.54%

+0.87%

Volatility

COFYX vs. CBALX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) at 2.39%. This indicates that COFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COFYXCBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

2.39%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

6.35%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

8.21%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

11.08%

+7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

11.34%

+7.70%

COFYX vs. CBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COFYX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than CBALX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

COFYX vs. CBALX - Dividend Comparison

COFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than CBALX's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBALX
Columbia Balanced Fund
6.08%6.42%7.83%1.84%5.36%9.26%5.31%4.16%5.82%2.79%1.60%4.05%
COFYX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class
6.58%7.27%9.52%3.11%10.48%13.50%7.65%10.86%10.15%4.82%0.75%5.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, COFYX and CBALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

COFYX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to CBALX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COFYX dropped -32.43% vs CBALX's -34.53%.

CBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COFYX and CBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer