COFYX vs. FDGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX).
COFYX is an actively managed fund by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2012. FDGFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 27, 1993.
Performance
COFYX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COFYX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COFYX Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class | -5.61% | 17.49% | 23.49% | 32.22% | -18.51% | 24.34% | 22.37% | 40.31% | -8.79% | 20.61% |
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund | -0.09% | 22.48% | 27.58% | 17.86% | -11.61% | 27.96% | 2.20% | 28.75% | -7.23% | 18.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COFYX achieves a -5.61% return, which is significantly lower than FDGFX's -0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, COFYX has outperformed FDGFX with an annualized return of 13.93%, while FDGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.41% annualized return.
COFYX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -5.61%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.93%
FDGFX
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COFYX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
COFYX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COFYX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank
COFYX
FDGFX
COFYX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COFYX | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.53 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 2.15 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 2.41 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 10.70 | -5.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COFYX | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.53 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.65 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.50 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between COFYX and FDGFX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
COFYX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison
COFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, less than FDGFX's 9.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COFYX Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class | 7.70% | 7.27% | 9.52% | 3.11% | 10.48% | 13.50% | 7.65% | 10.86% | 10.15% | 4.82% | 0.75% | 5.96% |
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund | 9.36% | 9.35% | 9.81% | 3.48% | 11.46% | 7.81% | 1.89% | 4.84% | 22.93% | 15.35% | 1.58% | 8.44% |
Drawdowns
COFYX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COFYX drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, smaller than the maximum FDGFX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFYX and FDGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COFYX | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.43% | -60.77% | +28.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -12.19% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -21.37% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.43% | -41.29% | +8.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -7.30% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -7.56% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.74% | +0.18% |
Volatility
COFYX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) is 5.32%, while Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that COFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COFYX | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 6.38% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 10.95% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.74% | 19.12% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 16.56% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 19.17% | -0.15% |