CNXT vs. MOAT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).

CNXT and MOAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNXT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2014. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012. Both CNXT and MOAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CNXT vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CNXT vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	3.20%	59.31%	12.42%	-21.47%	-35.58%	8.78%	63.30%	42.66%	-39.48%	20.19%
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-6.87%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 3.87%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.

CNXT

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 65.33%
• 3Y*: 12.24%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: 3.87%

MOAT

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -9.39%
• YTD: -6.87%
• 6M: -2.70%
• 1Y: 11.53%
• 3Y*: 10.62%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: 13.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNXT vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.

CNXT

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF

MOAT

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

Return for Risk

CNXT vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT

CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 90
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 31
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNXT vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNXT	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	0.59	+1.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	0.98	+1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.13	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	0.83	+2.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	3.12	+10.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNXT vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and MOAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNXT	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	0.59	+1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.44	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.72	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.75	-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between CNXT and MOAT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CNXT vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than MOAT's 1.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	0.17%	0.18%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	9.22%	0.01%	0.45%	0.00%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.46%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Drawdowns

CNXT vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNXT	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.98%	-33.31%	-35.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	-13.30%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.21%	-23.96%	-37.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.30%	-33.31%	-29.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.37%	-10.42%	-13.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.41%	-3.80%	-39.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.73%	3.55%	+1.18%

Volatility

CNXT vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.78%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNXT	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.46%	4.78%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.80%	10.10%	+9.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.89%	19.76%	+12.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.92%	18.09%	+16.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.54%	18.71%	+12.83%