CNQ vs. MFC
CNQ (Canadian Natural Resources Limited) and MFC (Manulife Financial Corporation) are both stocks. CNQ operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while MFC operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CNQ returned 16.52%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for MFC. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNQ vs. MFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 32.47% return, which is significantly higher than MFC's 19.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CNQ having a 16.52% annualized return and MFC not far ahead at 17.14%.
CNQ
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 30.54%
- YTD
- 32.47%
- 1Y
- 49.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 28.63%
- 10Y*
- 16.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.35%
MFC
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- YTD
- 19.41%
- 1Y
- 43.32%
- 3Y*
- 35.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.55%
CNQ vs. MFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 32.47% | 15.58% | -1.31% | 23.72% | 42.82% | 83.55% | -19.06% | 39.72% | -29.92% | 15.97% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 19.41% | 22.95% | 45.75% | 31.13% | -1.18% | 12.17% | -7.18% | 49.19% | -29.89% | 22.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQ and MFC is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000 | 0.43 |
The correlation between CNQ and MFC shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNQ:
$91.67B
MFC:
$70.93B
CNQ:
CA$4.66
MFC:
CA$4.17
CNQ:
13.21
MFC:
14.27
CNQ:
0.63
MFC:
5.01
CNQ:
3.15
MFC:
1.15
CNQ:
2.88
MFC:
1.63
CNQ:
CA$40.74B
MFC:
CA$79.35B
CNQ:
CA$12.53B
MFC:
CA$26.46B
CNQ:
CA$22.99B
MFC:
CA$8.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNQ vs. MFC — Risk / Return Rank
CNQ
MFC
CNQ vs. MFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNQ | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.48 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 10.70 | -3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNQ vs. MFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, roughly equal to the maximum MFC drawdown of -83.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and MFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNQ | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.75% | -83.61% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.45% | -12.49% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.85% | -16.75% | -19.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.85% | -26.99% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.84% | -57.44% | -20.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.30% | -2.05% | -9.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.49% | -29.29% | +5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 4.06% | +2.94% |
Volatility
CNQ vs. MFC - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) at 4.97%. This indicates that CNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNQ | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.33% | 4.97% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.39% | 16.10% | +7.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.76% | 20.29% | +9.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.74% | 24.08% | +8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.24% | 28.11% | +12.13% |
Dividends
CNQ vs. MFC - Dividend Comparison
CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than MFC's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 4.01% | 5.01% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.78% | 5.26% | 3.49% | 4.56% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 4.21% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.14% | 3.45% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 4.91% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 4.15% | 5.38% |
Financials
CNQ vs. MFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNQ vs. MFC - Profitability Comparison
CNQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
MFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.31B and revenue of 12.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CNQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.
MFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
CNQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
MFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNQ and MFC have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNQ has higher volatility (9.33%) compared to MFC (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNQ dropped -80.75% vs MFC's -83.61%.
MFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNQ and MFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer