PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MFC vs. SLF.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MFCSLF.TO
YTD Return52.46%24.83%
1Y Return82.71%32.01%
3Y Return (Ann)24.37%10.38%
5Y Return (Ann)16.93%10.89%
10Y Return (Ann)10.48%11.60%
Sharpe Ratio3.922.15
Sortino Ratio5.452.88
Omega Ratio1.701.43
Calmar Ratio3.792.69
Martin Ratio27.356.90
Ulcer Index3.06%4.71%
Daily Std Dev21.44%15.14%
Max Drawdown-83.74%-71.53%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Fundamentals


MFCSLF.TO
Market Cap$56.82BCA$47.83B
EPS$2.03CA$6.12
PE Ratio15.9613.56
PEG Ratio1.011.26
Total Revenue (TTM)$38.21BCA$49.97B
Gross Profit (TTM)$25.54BCA$34.79B
EBITDA (TTM)$741.00MCA$589.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between MFC and SLF.TO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

MFC vs. SLF.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MFC achieves a 52.46% return, which is significantly higher than SLF.TO's 24.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MFC has underperformed SLF.TO with an annualized return of 10.48%, while SLF.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
27.40%
20.04%
MFC
SLF.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MFC vs. SLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MFC, currently valued at 3.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MFC, currently valued at 5.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MFC, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.70
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MFC, currently valued at 4.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MFC, currently valued at 26.50, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0026.50
SLF.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.75
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 4.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.28

MFC vs. SLF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFC Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the SLF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFC and SLF.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.83
1.48
MFC
SLF.TO

Dividends

MFC vs. SLF.TO - Dividend Comparison

MFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than SLF.TO's 3.83% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MFC
Manulife Financial Corporation
3.87%4.86%5.71%4.91%6.27%3.71%4.97%3.02%3.13%3.50%3.36%2.58%
SLF.TO
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.83%4.37%4.39%3.28%3.89%3.55%4.21%3.36%3.14%3.50%3.44%3.84%

Drawdowns

MFC vs. SLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, which is greater than SLF.TO's maximum drawdown of -71.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFC and SLF.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.05%
MFC
SLF.TO

Volatility

MFC vs. SLF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) at 5.17%. This indicates that MFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.10%
5.17%
MFC
SLF.TO

Financials

MFC vs. SLF.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manulife Financial Corporation and Sun Life Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. MFC values in USD, SLF.TO values in CAD