PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNQ vs. EPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNQ vs. EPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 37.99% return, which is significantly higher than EPD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has outperformed EPD with an annualized return of 18.22%, while EPD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.45% annualized return.


CNQ

1D
1.29%
1M
3.95%
YTD
37.99%
6M
38.89%
1Y
53.83%
3Y*
23.71%
5Y*
26.79%
10Y*
18.22%

EPD

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.89%
YTD
20.66%
6M
18.26%
1Y
27.33%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
16.72%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQ vs. EPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
37.99%15.58%-1.31%23.72%42.82%83.55%-19.06%39.72%-29.92%15.97%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
20.66%9.45%28.00%17.71%18.32%21.40%-23.61%21.88%-1.32%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CNQ and EPD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2000

0.41

The correlation between CNQ and EPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNQ:

$97.03B

EPD:

$82.06B

EPS

CNQ:

$4.65

EPD:

$2.69

PE Ratio

CNQ:

9.95

EPD:

13.93

PEG Ratio

CNQ:

0.48

EPD:

2.24

PS Ratio

CNQ:

2.37

EPD:

1.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNQ:

$40.74B

EPD:

$51.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNQ:

$12.53B

EPD:

$7.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNQ:

$22.99B

EPD:

$10.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNQ vs. EPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNQ
CNQ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

EPD
EPD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNQ vs. EPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNQEPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

3.63

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

11.00

-2.27

CNQ vs. EPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the EPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNQ and EPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNQEPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.74

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.98

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.43

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.54

-0.13

Drawdowns

CNQ vs. EPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, which is greater than EPD's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and EPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNQEPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.75%

-58.78%

-21.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-7.56%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.85%

-15.40%

-20.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.85%

-18.06%

-17.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.84%

-58.04%

-19.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.60%

-5.73%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-10.13%

-13.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.18%

2.49%

+3.69%

Volatility

CNQ vs. EPD - Volatility Comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) at 6.17%. This indicates that CNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNQEPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

6.17%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.90%

13.16%

+10.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.96%

15.81%

+13.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.84%

17.23%

+15.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.26%

24.16%

+16.10%

Dividends

CNQ vs. EPD - Dividend Comparison

CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than EPD's 5.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.76%5.01%5.02%4.17%6.31%3.78%5.26%3.49%4.56%3.08%2.94%4.21%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
5.84%6.74%6.63%7.51%7.79%8.20%9.09%6.23%6.97%6.29%5.88%5.90%

Financials

CNQ vs. EPD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Enterprise Products Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20222023202420252026
10.84B
14.39B
(CNQ) Total Revenue
(EPD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CNQ vs. EPD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
32.1%
13.1%
Portfolio components
CNQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

EPD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 14.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.

CNQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

EPD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 1.82B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

CNQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.

EPD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CNQ and EPD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNQ has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to EPD (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNQ dropped -80.75% vs EPD's -58.78%.

CNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNQ and EPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer