CNQ vs. CM
CNQ (Canadian Natural Resources Limited) and CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) are both stocks. CNQ operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while CM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CNQ returned 16.52%/yr vs 18.25%/yr for CM. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNQ vs. CM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CNQ having a 32.47% return and CM slightly lower at 31.96%. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has underperformed CM with an annualized return of 16.52%, while CM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.25% annualized return.
CNQ
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 30.54%
- YTD
- 32.47%
- 1Y
- 49.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 28.63%
- 10Y*
- 16.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.35%
CM
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 29.47%
- YTD
- 31.96%
- 1Y
- 65.91%
- 3Y*
- 45.62%
- 5Y*
- 21.86%
- 10Y*
- 18.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.79%
CNQ vs. CM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 32.47% | 15.58% | -1.31% | 23.72% | 42.82% | 83.55% | -19.06% | 39.72% | -29.92% | 15.97% |
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 31.96% | 49.02% | 37.83% | 27.23% | -25.71% | 42.29% | 9.25% | 19.22% | -19.75% | 26.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQ and CM is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000 | 0.42 |
The correlation between CNQ and CM shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNQ:
$91.67B
CM:
$109.15B
CNQ:
CA$4.66
CM:
CA$12.14
CNQ:
13.21
CM:
13.59
CNQ:
0.63
CM:
1.68
CNQ:
3.15
CM:
2.16
CNQ:
2.88
CM:
1.92
CNQ:
CA$40.74B
CM:
CA$61.84B
CNQ:
CA$12.53B
CM:
CA$28.74B
CNQ:
CA$22.99B
CM:
CA$13.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNQ vs. CM — Risk / Return Rank
CNQ
CM
CNQ vs. CM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNQ | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.55 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 6.14 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 23.92 | -16.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNQ vs. CM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, which is greater than CM's maximum drawdown of -71.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and CM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNQ | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.75% | -71.70% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.45% | -10.79% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.85% | -19.47% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.85% | -40.61% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.84% | -47.82% | -30.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.30% | -2.84% | -8.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.49% | -14.61% | -8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 2.76% | +4.24% |
Volatility
CNQ vs. CM - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 6.12%. This indicates that CNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNQ | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.33% | 6.12% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.39% | 16.61% | +6.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.76% | 19.68% | +10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.74% | 21.46% | +11.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.24% | 22.62% | +17.62% |
Dividends
CNQ vs. CM - Dividend Comparison
CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than CM's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 2.55% | 3.17% | 4.21% | 5.88% | 7.77% | 4.08% | 5.06% | 6.47% | 5.48% | 5.28% | 5.93% | 6.71% |
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 4.01% | 5.01% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.78% | 5.26% | 3.49% | 4.56% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 4.21% |
Financials
CNQ vs. CM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNQ vs. CM - Profitability Comparison
CNQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
CM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
CNQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.
CM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
CNQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
CM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNQ and CM have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNQ has higher volatility (9.33%) compared to CM (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNQ dropped -80.75% vs CM's -71.70%.
CM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNQ and CM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer