PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CM achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CM has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 17.69%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.


CM

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
27.79%
6M
26.38%
1Y
70.81%
3Y*
47.02%
5Y*
20.28%
10Y*
17.69%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
27.79%49.02%37.83%27.23%-25.71%42.29%9.25%19.22%-19.75%26.58%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CM and VOO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.58

The correlation between CM and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CM
CM Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CM Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CM Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.35

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.60

2.67

+3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.80

11.96

+13.84

CM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CM Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CM drawdown since its inception was -71.70%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.70%

-33.99%

-37.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-8.90%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-18.69%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.61%

-24.52%

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.82%

-33.99%

-13.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-3.14%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-3.68%

-10.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.99%

+0.76%

Volatility

CM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that CM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

4.83%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.03%

9.82%

+6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

12.46%

+6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

16.91%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.59%

18.02%

+4.57%

Dividends

CM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.58%3.17%4.21%5.88%7.77%4.08%5.06%6.47%5.48%5.28%5.93%6.71%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CM and VOO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CM has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CM dropped -71.70% vs VOO's -33.99%.

CM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CM and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer