CNL vs. GFI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CNL (Collective Mining Ltd) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CNL vs. GFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNL

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GFI

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -6.30%
• YTD: -7.79%
• 6M: -3.27%
• 1Y: 62.49%
• 3Y*: 40.22%
• 5Y*: 32.18%
• 10Y*: 28.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNL vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNL Collective Mining Ltd	3.42%
GFI Gold Fields Limited	-2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CNL and GFI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.60

Fundamentals

EPS CNL : -$0.91 GFI : $5.39
Total Revenue (TTM) CNL : $0.00 GFI : $13.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) CNL : -$97.50K GFI : $7.34B
EBITDA (TTM) CNL : -$48.35M GFI : $8.04B

Return for Risk

CNL vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFI

GFI Risk / Return Rank: 71
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 68
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNL vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNL	GFI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.39	0.13	+5.26

Drawdowns

CNL vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNL drawdown since its inception was -6.14%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNL and GFI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNL	GFI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-88.05%	+81.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-36.52%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-56.22%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.14%	-34.55%	+28.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-44.26%	+41.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	15.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNL	GFI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.05%	58.97%	+33.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.05%	52.19%	+39.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.05%	54.85%	+37.20%

Dividends

CNL vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison

CNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNL Collective Mining Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GFI Gold Fields Limited	4.71%	1.77%	2.94%	2.87%	3.40%	3.24%	1.72%	0.81%	1.61%	1.41%	1.35%	0.60%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNL and GFI in my portfolio?

CNL and GFI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.