PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CNL vs. CEU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

CNL vs. CEU.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) and CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO).

Performance

CNL vs. CEU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) and CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNL vs. CEU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
CNL
Collective Mining Ltd		20.70%250.72%56.98%
CEU.TO
CES Energy Solutions Corp.		48.12%32.29%22.13%
Different Trading Currencies

CNL is traded in USD, while CEU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CEU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNL:

$1.49B

CEU.TO:

CA$3.97B

EPS

CNL:

-$0.56

CEU.TO:

CA$0.93

PB Ratio

CNL:

24.51

CEU.TO:

4.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNL:

$0.00

CEU.TO:

CA$2.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNL:

-$314.79K

CEU.TO:

CA$586.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

CNL:

-$44.95M

CEU.TO:

CA$373.83M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNL achieves a 20.70% return, which is significantly lower than CEU.TO's 48.12% return.

CNL

1D
9.65%
1M
-15.17%
YTD
20.70%
6M
21.87%
1Y
102.65%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CEU.TO

1D
-0.92%
1M
7.35%
YTD
48.12%
6M
96.98%
1Y
161.21%
3Y*
92.23%
5Y*
62.96%
10Y*
20.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Collective Mining Ltd

CES Energy Solutions Corp.

Often compared with CNL:
CNL vs. EFX.TOCNL vs. VNP.TOCNL vs. VLE.TOCNL vs. E.TOCNL vs. GMIN.TOCNL vs. IMG.TOCNL vs. ARTGX
Often compared with CEU.TO:
CEU.TO vs. SES.TOCEU.TO vs. VBNK.TOCEU.TO vs. BDT.TOCEU.TO vs. OGD.TOCEU.TO vs. EFX.TOCEU.TO vs. VNP.TOCEU.TO vs. XBI

Return for Risk

CNL vs. CEU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CNL
CNL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
CEU.TO
CEU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CEU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNL vs. CEU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) and CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CNLCEU.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

4.00

-2.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

4.35

-2.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.64

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

6.57

-3.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.92

20.53

-13.60

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNL vs. CEU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNL Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the CEU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNL and CEU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CNLCEU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

4.00

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.43

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.39

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.23

0.50

+2.73

Correlation

The correlation between CNL and CEU.TO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CNL vs. CEU.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNL
Collective Mining Ltd		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CEU.TO
CES Energy Solutions Corp.		0.70%1.40%1.21%2.75%2.46%1.58%0.86%2.58%1.59%0.55%0.67%8.40%

Drawdowns

CNL vs. CEU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNL drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, smaller than the maximum CEU.TO drawdown of -95.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNL and CEU.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CNLCEU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.29%

-94.27%

+60.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.29%

-23.82%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-41.77%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-92.84%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.17%

-4.01%

-11.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-39.08%

+29.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.41%

8.78%

+6.63%

Volatility

CNL vs. CEU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) has a higher volatility of 27.44% compared to CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) at 8.58%. This indicates that CNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CNLCEU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.44%

8.58%

+18.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.20%

27.01%

+27.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.01%

40.57%

+28.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.89%

44.47%

+20.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.89%

53.85%

+11.04%

Financials

CNL vs. CEU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Collective Mining Ltd and CES Energy Solutions Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M202120222023202420250
664.51M
(CNL) Total Revenue
(CEU.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CNL values in USD, CEU.TO values in CAD