CNL vs. GMIN.TO

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) and G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO).

Performance

CNL vs. GMIN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) and G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CNL vs. GMIN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CNL Collective Mining Ltd	25.02%	250.72%	56.98%
GMIN.TO G Mining Ventures Corp	16.31%	302.58%	9.63%

Different Trading Currencies

CNL is traded in USD, while GMIN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GMIN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

EPS CNL : -$0.91 GMIN.TO : CA$1.26
Total Revenue (TTM) CNL : $0.00 GMIN.TO : CA$583.61M
Gross Profit (TTM) CNL : -$97.50K GMIN.TO : CA$401.97M
EBITDA (TTM) CNL : -$48.35M GMIN.TO : CA$485.72M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNL achieves a 25.02% return, which is significantly higher than GMIN.TO's 16.31% return.

CNL

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -3.39%
• YTD: 25.02%
• 6M: 37.66%
• 1Y: 100.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMIN.TO

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -7.41%
• YTD: 16.31%
• 6M: 72.73%
• 1Y: 173.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CNL vs. GMIN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNL

CNL Risk / Return Rank: 80
CNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
CNL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CNL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

GMIN.TO

GMIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 90
GMIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GMIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GMIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GMIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GMIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNL vs. GMIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) and G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNL	GMIN.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	2.60	-1.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.81	-0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.36	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	4.87	-1.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.10	12.60	-5.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNL vs. GMIN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNL Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the GMIN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNL and GMIN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNL	GMIN.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	2.60	-1.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.30	2.26	+1.04

Correlation

The correlation between CNL and GMIN.TO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CNL vs. GMIN.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNL nor GMIN.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CNL vs. GMIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNL drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, roughly equal to the maximum GMIN.TO drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNL and GMIN.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNL	GMIN.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.29%	-34.19%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.29%	-34.19%	+0.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.14%	-15.75%	+3.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.18%	-9.28%	+0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.44%	13.32%	+2.12%

Volatility

CNL vs. GMIN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) and G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO) have volatilities of 27.01% and 28.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNL	GMIN.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.01%	28.39%	-1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.37%	52.59%	+1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.15%	67.14%	+2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.84%	58.92%	+5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.84%	58.92%	+5.92%

Financials