CNCC.TO vs. BCCC

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

CNCC.TO (Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while BCCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CNCC.TO returned 23.65% vs -31.66% for BCCC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNCC.TO charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.

Performance

CNCC.TO vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CNCC.TO is traded in CAD, while BCCC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCCC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNCC.TO achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than BCCC's -18.44% return.

CNCC.TO

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: 9.11%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 1Y: 23.65%
• 3Y*: 15.72%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 6.42%
• ALL TIME*: 2.89%

BCCC

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 6.83%
• 6M: -19.71%
• YTD: -18.44%
• 1Y: -31.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -21.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	CA$149.95K	CA$207.88K	CA$254.11K
CNCC.TO Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF	CA$100.99K	CA$88.04K	CA$159.00K

CNCC.TO vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CNCC.TO Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF	11.10%	14.25%
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-18.44%	-7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CNCC.TO and BCCC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

CNCC.TO vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCC.TO

CNCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
CNCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CNCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CNCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CNCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CNCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

BCCC

BCCC Risk / Return Rank: 2
BCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCC.TO vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNCC.TO	BCCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	-0.89	+3.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	-1.16	+4.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	0.85	+0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	-0.74	+4.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.93	-1.22	+20.15

CNCC.TO vs. BCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the BCCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNCC.TO and BCCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNCC.TO vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -42.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCC.TO and BCCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCC.TO	BCCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.00%	-42.86%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-42.86%	+36.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-36.08%	+35.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.28%	-19.79%	+5.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	26.04%	-24.79%

Volatility

CNCC.TO vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) is 1.89%, while Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that CNCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNCC.TO	BCCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.89%	6.36%	-4.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.89%	28.73%	-20.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.44%	35.80%	-26.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.43%	34.71%	-22.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	34.71%	-19.96%

CNCC.TO vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCC.TO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNCC.TO vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison

CNCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, less than BCCC's 59.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	59.17%	29.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CNCC.TO Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF	6.75%	7.57%	9.68%	10.07%	5.76%	2.64%	2.77%	2.67%	3.02%	2.76%	2.62%	4.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNCC.TO and BCCC in my portfolio?

CNCC.TO and BCCC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNCC.TO or BCCC?

On fees, CNCC.TO is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNCC.TO or BCCC?

CNCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCCC.

What is the main difference between CNCC.TO and BCCC?

CNCC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while BCCC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for CNCC.TO and 0.75% for BCCC.