CNCC.TO vs. CASH.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO).
CNCC.TO and CASH.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNCC.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60. It was launched on Mar 16, 2011. CASH.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Nov 1, 2021.
Performance
CNCC.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNCC.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCC.TO Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF | 1.41% | 19.53% | 14.81% | 7.07% | -4.03% | 0.58% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.48% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 5.11% | 2.39% | 0.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNCC.TO achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's 0.48% return.
CNCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
CASH.TO
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNCC.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
CNCC.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNCC.TO
CASH.TO
CNCC.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNCC.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 10.40 | -8.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 32.87 | -30.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 7.68 | -6.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 115.33 | -113.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 477.09 | -466.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNCC.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 10.40 | -8.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 5.51 | -5.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNCC.TO and CASH.TO is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CNCC.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than CASH.TO's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCC.TO Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF | 6.82% | 7.59% | 9.68% | 10.07% | 9.93% | 5.28% | 5.53% | 5.33% | 6.06% | 5.52% | 5.24% | 8.54% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.31% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CNCC.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCC.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNCC.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -0.80% | -37.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.28% | -0.02% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.43% | -0.01% | -3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | 0.00% | -6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 0.00% | +1.90% |
Volatility
CNCC.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.05%. This indicates that CNCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNCC.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 0.05% | +4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 0.15% | +7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 0.22% | +12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.44% | 0.62% | +11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 0.62% | +14.18% |