PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF (CDAY.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNCC.TO achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than CDAY.NEO's 6.23% return.


CNCC.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
2.33%
6M
7.29%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
8.57%

CDAY.NEO

1D
0.46%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
6.23%
6M
10.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCC.TO
CNCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CNCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CNCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CDAY.NEO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF (CDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNCC.TOCDAY.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.89

CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNCC.TOCDAY.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

2.42

-2.42

Correlation

The correlation between CNCC.TO and CDAY.NEO is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison

CNCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, less than CDAY.NEO's 11.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNCC.TO
Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF
7.40%7.59%9.68%10.07%9.93%5.28%5.53%5.33%6.06%5.52%5.24%8.54%
CDAY.NEO
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF
11.30%7.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, which is greater than CDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCC.TO and CDAY.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNCC.TOCDAY.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-9.61%

-28.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-5.03%

+2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-1.20%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

Volatility

CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNCC.TOCDAY.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

13.45%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

13.45%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.81%

13.45%

+1.36%