CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF (CDAY.NEO).
CNCC.TO and CDAY.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNCC.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60. It was launched on Mar 16, 2011. CDAY.NEO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.
Performance
CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CNCC.TO Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF | 2.33% | 12.20% |
CDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF | 6.23% | 14.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNCC.TO achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than CDAY.NEO's 6.23% return.
CNCC.TO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 20.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
CDAY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
CNCC.TO
CDAY.NEO
CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF (CDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNCC.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNCC.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 2.42 | -2.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNCC.TO and CDAY.NEO is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
CNCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, less than CDAY.NEO's 11.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCC.TO Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF | 7.40% | 7.59% | 9.68% | 10.07% | 9.93% | 5.28% | 5.53% | 5.33% | 6.06% | 5.52% | 5.24% | 8.54% |
CDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF | 11.30% | 7.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, which is greater than CDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCC.TO and CDAY.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNCC.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -9.61% | -28.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -5.03% | +2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -1.20% | -5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | — | — |
Volatility
CNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNCC.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 13.45% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.46% | 13.45% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 13.45% | +1.36% |