CNAV vs. SPTM
CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CNAV is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past year, CNAV returned 57.23% vs 31.73% for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNAV charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
CNAV vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNAV achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's 3.30% return.
CNAV
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 12.62%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 57.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 31.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
CNAV vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 12.62% | 16.80% | 6.34% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 3.30% | 16.93% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNAV and SPTM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CNAV and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNAV vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
CNAV
SPTM
CNAV vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNAV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.56 | 2.41 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 3.34 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 3.77 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.41 | 17.13 | +3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNAV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.41 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.44 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
CNAV vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNAV drawdown since its inception was -30.06%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAV and SPTM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNAV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.06% | -54.80% | +24.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -8.68% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | 0.00% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -9.09% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 1.91% | +1.00% |
Volatility
CNAV vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 5.53%. This indicates that CNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNAV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.90% | 5.53% | +5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 9.46% | +8.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.58% | 13.28% | +9.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 16.91% | +9.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 18.04% | +7.97% |
CNAV vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNAV has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNAV vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.12% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |