PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CN vs. MCHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CN vs. MCHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CN vs. MCHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%1.55%
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
13.36%31.19%6.53%

Returns By Period


CN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MCHS

1D
2.32%
1M
-9.45%
YTD
13.36%
6M
9.20%
1Y
35.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CN vs. MCHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHS's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CN vs. MCHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CN

MCHS
MCHS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MCHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CN vs. MCHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CN vs. MCHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNMCHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

Correlation

The correlation between CN and MCHS is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CN vs. MCHS - Dividend Comparison

CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
3.14%3.56%5.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CN vs. MCHS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNMCHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

Volatility

CN vs. MCHS - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNMCHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.87%