CN vs. KWEB
CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both China Equities funds - CN tracks the MSCI China All Shares while KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.
Performance
CN vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KWEB
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- -20.32%
- 6M
- -22.46%
- 1Y
- -15.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- -14.33%
- 10Y*
- -0.18%
CN vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.10% | -11.87% | -23.85% | -12.74% | 31.55% | 26.79% | -22.41% | 43.69% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -20.32% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -17.24% | -49.01% | 58.23% | 29.92% | -33.80% | 69.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CN and KWEB is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014 | 0.70 |
The correlation between CN and KWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.74 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CN vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CN
KWEB
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
-
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CN
KWEB
Consumer Cyclical
CN
KWEB
Industrials
CN
KWEB
Energy
CN
KWEB
-
Real Estate
CN
KWEB
Healthcare
CN
KWEB
Basic Materials
CN
KWEB
-
Communication Services
CN
KWEB
Technology
CN
KWEB
Consumer Defensive
CN
KWEB
Utilities
CN
KWEB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CN vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank
CN
KWEB
CN vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CN | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.06 | — |
Drawdowns
CN vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CN | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -80.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -68.62% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.25% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.97% | — |
Volatility
CN vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CN | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 27.25% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 47.67% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 39.98% | — |
CN vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CN vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 7.73% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CN and KWEB have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 0.00% for CN.
CN tracks MSCI China All Shares, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.70% for KWEB.
Find the right allocation for CN and KWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer