CN vs. FXP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) and FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) are both China Equities funds - CN tracks the MSCI China All Shares while FXP tracks the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.77, they often move in opposite directions. CN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FXP.

Performance

CN vs. FXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FXP

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 9.06%
• 6M: 42.91%
• YTD: 26.04%
• 1Y: 11.22%
• 3Y*: -25.63%
• 5Y*: -16.22%
• 10Y*: -21.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CN vs. FXP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-12.74%	31.55%	26.79%	-22.41%	43.69%
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50	26.04%	-45.32%	-52.46%	12.74%	-11.73%	23.56%	-39.47%	-29.01%	12.45%	-49.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CN and FXP is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2014	-0.77

The correlation between CN and FXP shifts across timeframes, from -0.79 (10 years) to -0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CN vs. FXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FXP

FXP Risk / Return Rank: 15
FXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FXP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FXP Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CN vs. FXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CN	FXP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.28	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.68	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.08	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.51	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.94	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CN	FXP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-99.94%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-82.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-87.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-93.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-99.91%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-94.16%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	13.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CN	FXP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	40.22%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	63.15%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	54.76%	—

CN vs. FXP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FXP's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CN vs. FXP - Dividend Comparison

CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50	2.85%	9.57%	3.55%	2.20%	0.06%	0.00%	0.06%	1.20%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CN and FXP in my portfolio?

CN and FXP have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CN or FXP?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CN or FXP?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CN or FXP?

FXP has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between CN and FXP?

CN tracks MSCI China All Shares, while FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.95% for FXP.