CMGIX vs. VOT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CMGIX (BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CMGIX returned 12.48%/yr vs 12.21%/yr for VOT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CMGIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.

Performance

CMGIX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMGIX having a 8.90% return and VOT slightly higher at 9.14%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMGIX having a 12.48% annualized return and VOT not far behind at 12.21%.

CMGIX

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: 3.70%
• YTD: 8.90%
• 6M: 6.49%
• 1Y: 7.72%
• 3Y*: 11.95%
• 5Y*: 1.78%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

VOT

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 6M: 6.88%
• 1Y: 12.25%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 7.03%
• 10Y*: 12.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMGIX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	8.90%	0.49%	12.44%	28.24%	-37.36%	14.51%	46.13%	36.19%	2.88%	34.59%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	9.14%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-28.87%	20.50%	34.50%	33.76%	-5.56%	21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CMGIX and VOT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006	0.95

The correlation between CMGIX and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CMGIX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMGIX

CMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 6
CMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 22
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMGIX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMGIX	VOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	0.78	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	1.18	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.14	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	0.77	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.81	2.31	-0.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMGIX vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMGIX and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMGIX	VOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	0.78	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.33	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.58	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.45	-0.05

Drawdowns

CMGIX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.85%, which is greater than VOT's maximum drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGIX and VOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMGIX	VOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.85%	-60.16%	-13.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.90%	-15.96%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.77%	-21.77%	-8.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.96%	-37.19%	-8.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.96%	-37.19%	-8.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.65%	-0.14%	-7.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.66%	-9.96%	-18.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	5.32%	-0.54%

Volatility

CMGIX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 4.30%. This indicates that CMGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMGIX	VOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	4.30%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.16%	12.37%	+4.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.06%	15.79%	+5.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.05%	21.35%	+3.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.45%	20.98%	+2.47%

CMGIX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMGIX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

CMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.47%, more than VOT's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	19.47%	21.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.94%	0.00%	0.39%	4.72%	3.31%	0.00%	2.57%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.61%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMGIX and VOT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, CMGIX and VOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CMGIX or VOT?

CMGIX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to VOT (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMGIX dropped -73.85% vs VOT's -60.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.