CMGIX vs. FDEGX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CMGIX (BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio) and FDEGX (Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CMGIX returned 12.32%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for FDEGX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMGIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FDEGX.

Performance

CMGIX vs. FDEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMGIX achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly higher than FDEGX's 9.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMGIX having a 12.32% annualized return and FDEGX not far behind at 11.81%.

CMGIX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 2.27%
• 6M: 5.89%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 1Y: 9.71%
• 3Y*: 10.95%
• 5Y*: 0.77%
• 10Y*: 12.32%

FDEGX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -1.67%
• 6M: 5.03%
• YTD: 9.72%
• 1Y: 1.27%
• 3Y*: 14.40%
• 5Y*: 6.44%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMGIX vs. FDEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	11.26%	0.49%	12.44%	28.24%	-37.36%	14.51%	46.13%	36.19%	2.88%	34.59%
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	9.72%	2.88%	26.57%	20.93%	-26.50%	21.30%	29.34%	36.59%	-6.92%	21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CMGIX and FDEGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1996	0.94

The correlation between CMGIX and FDEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CMGIX vs. FDEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMGIX

CMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 8
CMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
CMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FDEGX

FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMGIX vs. FDEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMGIX	FDEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	0.02	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	0.19	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.02	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	0.03	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.84	0.07	+1.78

CMGIX vs. FDEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the FDEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMGIX and FDEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMGIX vs. FDEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.85%, smaller than the maximum FDEGX drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGIX and FDEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMGIX	FDEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.85%	-85.96%	+12.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.90%	-20.45%	+5.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.77%	-26.04%	-3.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.96%	-36.62%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.96%	-36.62%	-9.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.65%	-5.89%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.58%	-36.73%	+8.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.81%	8.13%	-3.32%

Volatility

CMGIX vs. FDEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) is 7.45%, while Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that CMGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMGIX	FDEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	8.22%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.11%	17.54%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.27%	23.28%	-1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.28%	23.58%	+1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.50%	22.14%	+1.36%

CMGIX vs. FDEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FDEGX's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMGIX vs. FDEGX - Dividend Comparison

CMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.05%, while FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	19.05%	21.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.94%	0.00%	0.39%	4.72%	3.31%	0.00%	2.57%
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	7.89%	0.05%	0.00%	14.15%	8.37%	3.65%	0.75%	0.05%	0.59%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMGIX and FDEGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, CMGIX and FDEGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CMGIX or FDEGX?

FDEGX has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to CMGIX (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMGIX dropped -73.85% vs FDEGX's -85.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.